Register / Vendor record
Mass Tort Ad Agency
Mass Tort Ad Agency (formerly X Social Media LLC)
Ownership conflict
Ownership conflict: Mass Tort Ad Agency and LegalVendorIndex share a beneficial owner (Jacob Malherbe). This record was produced under the same criteria and crawl process as every other record, and this notice cannot be removed by the vendor.
| Legal entity | Mass Tort Ad Agency (formerly X Social Media LLC) |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Florida, United States |
| Segment | Mass tort demand generation — Meta advertising and intake |
| Primary domain | masstortadagency.com |
| First crawled | 2026-08-25 |
| Last crawled | 2026-08-25 |
| Attestation | attested |
Disclosure, cycle 2026-08-25
12 of 19 criteria published · 3 partially · 3 not published · 1 not assessed · 0 contradictions · 34.5 of 46 weighted points · 75%
- Published
- Partially
- Not published
- Not applicable / not assessed
- Contradiction
Derived from 19 findings at request time under methodology v1.3. This figure is not stored and is recomputed whenever the methodology or the underlying findings change.
By section
| Section | Points | Available | Disclosure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | 7.5 | 10 | 75% |
| Consent | 17 | 17 | 100% |
| Operations | 4 | 12 | 33% |
| Evidence | 6 | 7 | 86% |
Findings
| Code | Criterion | Verdict | Finding | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDN-01 | Legal entity Is the operating legal entity named, with its state of registration? |
Partially published | The predecessor entity (X Social Media LLC) and the September 2025 rebrand are disclosed; the current operating entity's legal form and state of registration are not stated. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com home page with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 54a5bf67e7cfe8c1 F-20001 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| IDN-02 | Named leadership Are the individuals responsible for the business identified by name and role? |
Published | Founder and CEO is named with a dedicated bio page, stated non-attorney status, and published books and press history. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com home page with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 54a5bf67e7cfe8c1 F-20002 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| IDN-04 | Operating address Is a physical operating address published, as distinct from a registered agent? |
Partially published | Headquarters city and state are published (Winter Garden, Florida); no street-level operating address is stated. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com home page with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 54a5bf67e7cfe8c1 F-20003 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| IDN-05 | Advertising review ownership Is it stated who reviews creative against state bar advertising rules before it runs? |
Published | States that every ad and landing page is approved in writing by the firm of record before launch, placing bar-rule review with the retaining firm. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com home page with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 54a5bf67e7cfe8c1 F-20004 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| CNS-01 | Certificate of origin Does the vendor publish that each lead ships with its originating URL and capture timestamp? |
Published | Publishes that chain-of-custody is documented on every lead: the originating ad, the consent capture, and the qualification path. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com home page with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 54a5bf67e7cfe8c1 F-20005 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| CNS-02 | One-to-one consent Is one-to-one consent language published on the lead capture forms, naming the receiving party? |
Published | One-to-one consent language is published on the live capture form, naming the single firm of record as receiving party (plus parties calling on its behalf), with consent stated as not required for services and a revocation path. Originally revised from not published on a verified vendor attestation (A-cns02-mtaa1); subsequently crawl-verified on a live public capture page the same day. | Live MTAA capture page crawl — TrustedForm certificate field and Jornaya LeadiD token present; one-to-one consent language on the public form raw_html · 2026-08-25
sha256 4a8342a909c5476f F-20006 · v1.3 · reviewer-jm |
| CNS-03 | Named recipient list Are receiving parties enumerated, rather than referred to as marketing partners? |
Published | Model publishes a single recipient: leads and signed cases belong to the one firm of record, which owns the ad account, pixel, creative, and claimant data. No partner-network language is used. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com home page with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 54a5bf67e7cfe8c1 F-20007 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| CNS-04 | Consent capture method Is an independent consent capture service, or an equivalent method, disclosed? |
Published | Two independent consent capture services are observably embedded on a live MTAA capture page: a TrustedForm certificate field and a Jornaya LeadiD token, both present in the raw form HTML. The vendor states the same capture stack runs on every MTAA lander. Revised from partially published on a supplemental crawl of a live capture page. | Live MTAA capture page crawl — TrustedForm certificate field and Jornaya LeadiD token present; one-to-one consent language on the public form raw_html · 2026-08-25
sha256 4a8342a909c5476f F-20008 · v1.3 · reviewer-jm |
| CNS-05 | Resale and exclusivity Is it stated whether a lead is sold once or resold, and under what exclusivity window? |
Published | States explicitly that leads are not bought, not resold, and carry no case-fee split; each campaign's leads belong to the retaining firm. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com home page with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 54a5bf67e7cfe8c1 F-20009 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| CNS-06 | Publisher disclosure Are affiliate publishers named, or is an audit process for them published? |
Published | States that no affiliate-sourced traffic is resold and no publisher networks are aggregated; all traffic originates from ads the vendor places directly. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com home page with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 54a5bf67e7cfe8c1 F-20010 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| OPS-01 | Call recording retention Is a retention period for intake call recordings published? |
Not published | In-house intake (CloudIntake) is described; no retention period for intake call recordings is published. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com privacy policy with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 a9e0a6d2d429f379 F-20011 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| OPS-02 | Intake geography Is the location where intake calls are answered stated? |
Published | Intake calls are answered by CloudIntake in Utah, United States, per verified vendor attestation (A-ops02-mtaa1). The location is not yet stated on a public page; attestation credit applies until it is published, at which point the next crawl converts this to a crawl-verified finding. | Vendor attestation: CloudIntake intake operations located in Utah, United States document · 2026-08-25
sha256 1f609fd8f02a1541 F-20012 · v1.3 · reviewer-jm |
| OPS-03 | Business associate agreement Is the availability of a HIPAA business associate agreement published? |
Not published | No reference to a HIPAA business associate agreement appears in any public document reviewed. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com privacy policy with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 a9e0a6d2d429f379 F-20013 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| OPS-04 | Security attestation Is a current third-party security attestation published or offered on request? |
Not published | The privacy policy describes HTTPS, database storage, and access controls; no current third-party security attestation is published or offered on request. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com privacy policy with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 a9e0a6d2d429f379 F-20014 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| OPS-05 | Return and credit terms Are the terms for rejecting and crediting a non-qualifying lead published? |
Published | Fee mechanics are published in full: cost-plus 15%, $1,000 per-tort setup, $100 qualification fee charged only on signed retainers, and unspent budget refundable at any time. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com home page with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 54a5bf67e7cfe8c1 F-20015 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| EVD-01 | Performance claim method Do published conversion or retention claims carry a denominator and a measurement method? |
Published | Cost-per-signed-retainer table publishes denominators (e.g. 10,322 leads to 1,998 signed retainers with dates), a stated calculation formula, the reporting window, and flags rows that lack connected counts. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com home page with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 54a5bf67e7cfe8c1 F-20016 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| EVD-02 | Named references Are client references named, rather than described anonymously by region or size? |
Published | Seven client references are named with their firms, including Lerner & Rowe, Andrews & Thornton, Levin Papantonio, and Brent Coon & Associates. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com home page with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 54a5bf67e7cfe8c1 F-20017 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| EVD-03 | Ad library consistency Do the vendor live ads match the compliance posture stated in its public disclosures? |
Not applicable | Not assessed this cycle: the Meta Ad Library comparison against the stated compliance posture has not yet been performed. Excluded from derivation until the first ad-library crawl. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com home page with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 54a5bf67e7cfe8c1 F-20018 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
| EVD-04 | Disclosure change log Are material changes to published terms dated and archived? |
Partially published | Published terms carry a last-updated date; no archived history of material changes is available. | Text capture of masstortadagency.com privacy policy with verbatim excerpts document · 2026-08-25
sha256 a9e0a6d2d429f379 F-20019 · v1.3 · claude-crawl-01 |
Prior cycles
| Crawl date | Methodology | Published | Partial | Not published |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-25 | v1.3 | 12 | 3 | 3 |
How to change this page
Publish the missing disclosure. Every unpublished finding above names a question with no public answer. Publishing an answer at a stable URL is sufficient; the next crawl picks it up.
Attest between cycles. Submit a disclosure URL, or the artifact itself if you would rather not publish it. Submissions enter the review queue and update the record without waiting for the quarterly crawl.
Dispute a finding. Cite the finding ID and the URL you believe was misread. Disputes are adjudicated against the retained evidence artifact. If the artifact does not support the finding, the finding is withdrawn and the withdrawal stays visible in this record.